Loading ToolBench
Single tool 'tool_result_read' has a minimal description (47 chars) and a basic input schema with only a 'handle' string parameter. The description lacks context about when/why to use this tool, what it returns, or error handling. No output schema is documented. The tool appears to be an internal implementation detail (reading cached tool results) rather than a user-facing agent tool. No evidence of LLM-optimized descriptions, parameter validation guidance, or error recovery patterns.
Read a previously stored tool result by handle
Tool description is too brief (47 chars) and lacks context. Does not explain WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, or WHAT it returns. Minimum 50-100 chars required for LLM selection.
No output schema documented. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract data without knowing the response structure.
Input parameter 'handle' lacks validation guidance. No description of format, length, or constraints. LLMs cannot validate inputs before calling.
No error handling guidance. Tool does not document what happens if handle is invalid, expired, or not found. No recovery path for LLM.
Tool name 'tool_result_read' is generic and does not follow verb_noun pattern clearly. 'read_tool_result' would be more discoverable.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 34 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |