Alert dedup, correlation, and routing in front of Grafana / PagerDuty
Single tool 'alertmux_scan' has a basic description (67 chars) but critically lacks parameter descriptions. The input schema defines 'target' as a string with a description ('Target path to scan for alerts'), which is minimal but present. However, the tool description does not explain what constitutes a valid target, expected output format, or error conditions. No output schema is documented. The tool name follows verb_noun convention (scan), but the description is generic and does not guide LLM selection or explain when to use it vs. alternatives. No error handling guidance, no pagination, no structured output documentation.
Alert dedup, correlation, and routing in front of Grafana / PagerDuty. Returns JSON findings.
No output schema documented. Tool returns JSON string but LLM cannot infer structure (fields, types, nesting). Prevents downstream tool chaining and forces LLM to parse unstructured text.
Parameter 'target' description is minimal (27 chars). Does not explain valid formats (file path? directory? glob?), constraints (must exist?), or examples. LLM cannot reliably construct valid calls.
Tool description (67 chars) lacks context for LLM selection. Does not explain when to call alertmux_scan vs. other scanning tools, what 'dedup/correlation/routing' means in this context, or what findings are returned.
No error handling guidance. Tool may fail on invalid paths, permission errors, or malformed files. LLM receives no recovery hints (e.g., 'check path exists', 'verify permissions').
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 48 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Tool description mentions 'Grafana / PagerDuty' but tool implementation only scans files for TODO/FIXME/XXX markers. Description is misleading about actual functionality.