Single tool 'honeyurl_scan' has a basic description (67 chars) but critically lacks parameter descriptions. The input schema defines 'target' as a string with a description, but the tool description does not explain what 'target' should contain (file path? URL? directory?), when to use this tool, or what the JSON output structure contains. No output schema is documented. The tool name follows verb_noun convention (scan), but the description is too terse to guide LLM selection. No error handling guidance, no pagination, no field documentation for the returned JSON. Baseline: 100% of A+ tools have param descriptions; this tool has 0/1 params described in the tool docstring itself.

• Add a detailed parameter description for 'target': 'File path, directory, or URL to scan for canary tokens. If a directory, recursively scans all files. Required.'
• Document the output schema in the tool description: 'Returns JSON object with fields: tool (string), findings (array of {id, sev, where}), score (integer count of findings).'
• Expand tool description to 100 - 200 chars explaining WHAT (scans for canary token access), WHEN (after deploying canary tokens to detect unauthorized access), and WHAT IT RETURNS (JSON findings with severity and location).
• Add error handling guidance: 'If target is not found or unreadable, returns empty findings array. If target is not a valid path, returns error with guidance to check path format.'
• Consider renaming to 'scan_for_canary_access' or 'detect_canary_tokens' to make the action and domain clearer to LLMs unfamiliar with 'honeyurl' terminology.