Loading ToolBench
MCP server for executing deterministic, zero-dependency Edge Robotics, Embodied Telemetry & Kinematics operations with ROS2 QoS profile negotiation capabilities
Single tool with minimal definition quality. Tool name 'execute_skill_action' is generic and does not follow verb_noun pattern (should be specific like 'negotiate_qos_profile' or 'execute_ros2_operation'). Description is vague marketing copy ('Execute deterministic, zero-dependency Edge Robotics...') that does not explain WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, or WHAT it returns. Parameter 'query_payload' is a free-form string with no format guidance, constraints, or examples. No output schema documented, response structure is inferred from code (status/message JSON) but not formally declared. No error handling guidance. Tool appears to be a pass-through wrapper with no actual implementation visible.
Execute deterministic, zero-dependency Edge Robotics, Embodied Telemetry & Kinematics operations verified by GenPark AI.
Tool name 'execute_skill_action' is generic and does not convey specific action. Should follow verb_noun pattern (e.g., 'negotiate_qos_profile', 'configure_ros2_qos'). LLMs cannot infer intent from 'execute_skill_action' alone.
Description is marketing copy, not a functional docstring. Does not state WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, or WHAT it returns. Should explain: 'Negotiates QoS parameters for ROS2 topics based on network conditions (bandwidth, packet loss). Returns recommended reliability, durability, and deadline settings.'
Parameter 'query_payload' is a free-form string with no format specification, constraints, or examples. Should document expected JSON structure, required fields, and valid values. Current description 'Input execution payload for this skill' is too vague.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 27 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No output schema documented. Response structure (status, message fields) is inferred from code but not formally declared in tool definition. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations without knowing return type.
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tool always returns success status regardless of input validity. LLMs have no way to distinguish real success from mock responses or to self-correct on failure.