Server has 13 well-named tools with consistent verb_noun patterns (search_*, get_*, list_*). All tools have descriptions (avg ~80 chars, within baseline 34-392). Input schemas are present with typed parameters and descriptions. However, output schemas are not documented in the visible code, LLMs cannot predict return structure. Error handling is absent; no recovery guidance or categorization. Tool descriptions lack dependency hints and prerequisites. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, etc.) despite all being read-only. Composition is strong: tools chain well (search → get → detail), but descriptions don't guide multi-step workflows.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Include field names, types, and example structure. E.g., search_winget returns [{package_id: string, version: string, summary: string, ...}].
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Package not found. Try search_winget() with a partial name or check spelling.'
• Add tool annotations to schema: set readOnlyHint=true for all tools (they are all read-only). This enables clients to mark them as safe for autonomous execution.
• Enhance descriptions with dependency hints. E.g., search_winget: 'Use this to discover packages. Once you have a package_id, call get_winget_package() for full metadata.'
• Document pagination behavior. Clarify whether limit caps results, whether there's a default offset, and whether total_count is returned. Add offset/cursor parameter if needed.

Inferred effective spec: 2026-07-28+.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry