Only 1 tool visible in source code (get_insider_activity). Package.json claims 112 tools across 33 services, but actual tool definitions are not present in provided source. The single visible tool has a strong description (145 chars, well-structured) and complete input schema with proper types and descriptions. However, the vast majority of claimed tools cannot be evaluated, they appear to be proxied through WorldMonitorClient or defined in service registries without explicit schema visibility. With only 1 evaluable tool scoring ~65 and 111+ tools capped at 0 (not visible), the average is heavily penalized.

• Provide complete tool definitions in source code with explicit schema registration. Include input schema (types, descriptions, constraints) and documented output schema for all 112 tools.
• Add 50-200 character descriptions to every tool explaining WHAT it does, WHEN to use it, and any prerequisites. Current service registries lack descriptions.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify return type, field names, and structure so LLMs can plan multi-step operations.
• Add error handling guidance: categorize errors as retryable/user-fixable/fatal and suggest recovery steps (e.g., 'Try search_users() with a partial name').
• For tools accepting IDs, also accept human-friendly identifiers (names, emails, symbols). Resolve them server-side to reduce lookup calls and match the chat data model.