mcpnuke exposes 4 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but falls short of production quality. All tools have descriptions (10-60 chars, below the 50-200 char baseline for LLM optimization) and input schemas with type definitions. However, parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely. The ticket.create tool lacks descriptions for both 'title' and 'body' parameters. No output schemas are documented. Error handling is minimal, no recovery guidance, no categorization of retryable vs fatal errors. The tool set mixes read-only operations (docs.search, file.read, http.fetch) with a write operation (ticket.create) without clear permission boundaries or audit trails. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) are present despite the risk taxonomy being declared.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 characters. Example: 'docs.search: Search product documentation by keyword. Returns matching lines with file names and line numbers. Use this to find relevant docs before reading full files with file.read.'
• Add descriptions to all parameters. For ticket.create: title='Brief summary (max 120 chars, no newlines)', body='Detailed description in markdown (max 4000 chars)'.
• Document output schemas for each tool. E.g., docs.search returns [{file: string, line_number: int, text: string}]. ticket.create returns {ticket_id: string, created_at: ISO8601}.
• Add tool annotations: mark file.read, docs.search, http.fetch with readOnlyHint=true; mark ticket.create with destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false.
• Implement error handling with recovery guidance. E.g., 'File not found. Available files: [list]. Try docs.search() to find the right file.' Categorize errors as retryable (timeout, rate limit) vs user-fixable (invalid file name).