MACE defines 5 tools with clear verb-noun naming (list_*, update_*, fix_*) and reasonable descriptions (avg ~150 chars). All tools have input schemas with type definitions. However, parameter descriptions are inconsistent: some params lack descriptions entirely (e.g., 'policyPath' in list_component_styles has a description, but 'regionPath' in list_pages is minimal). Output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot predict what list_pages or list_style_violations return. Error handling is absent from visible code; no guidance on retryability or recovery. The fix_style_violations tool accepts a complex nested array but provides no validation rules or examples. Overall: functional definitions with gaps in completeness and LLM-optimization.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example: list_pages should return {pages: [{path: string, title?: string}], total: number}. This enables LLMs to chain tools correctly.
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. E.g., 'If regionPath is invalid, return error: "Path must start with /content/ and exist in AEM. Try list_pages with parent path first."'
• Expand parameter descriptions with format constraints. E.g., regionPath: 'AEM content path (must start with /content/, max 255 chars). Example: /content/wknd/language-masters/en'
• Add pagination to list_pages and list_style_violations. Include limit (default 20, max 100) and offset/cursor parameters. Return total count so agents know if more results exist.
• Clarify styleId vs style name in update_component_style and fix_style_violations. Provide an enum or explicit guidance: 'Pass style name (e.g., "Default", "Featured") when policyPath is available; use cq:styleId only if name is unknown.'