Server has 5 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (search-, project-, run-, fetch-, validate-), which is good. However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), parameter descriptions are sparse or missing, and output schemas are not documented. The run-command tool accepts arbitrary allowlisted commands but lacks clear error handling and recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) despite clear risk profiles. Parameter constraints (enums, ranges) are mostly absent. Error responses are not documented. This is typical of community servers, functional but not production-grade.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example for search-codebase: 'Returns {matches: [{file: string, line: number, content: string}], total: number, nextCursor?: string}'. This enables LLMs to chain tools and extract required fields.
• Expand tool descriptions to 80-150 chars. Example: 'Search codebase files by regex pattern. Returns matching file paths, line numbers, and snippets. Use to locate code references before viewing or modifying. Supports optional glob filtering.'
• Add parameter descriptions and constraints. Example for depth: 'Maximum directory depth to traverse (1-10, default 3). Higher values may be slow on large projects.' For action enum: 'validate: check syntax, format: pretty-print with 2-space indent, minify: remove whitespace.'
• Add tool annotations. Mark search-codebase, project-structure, fetch-api-spec with readOnlyHint=true. Mark run-command with destructiveHint=true and require confirmation for dangerous commands (rm, delete, drop, etc.).
• Implement error recovery guidance. For run-command: 'Command failed: {error}. Allowlisted commands: {list}. Check syntax and try again.' For fetch-api-spec: 'Failed to fetch URL: {reason}. Verify URL is accessible and returns valid OpenAPI 3.0 JSON.'