Five tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. All tools have descriptions (10-30 chars), but most are too terse to guide LLM selection. Input schemas present but lack descriptions for parameters. No output schemas documented. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. Naming follows verb_noun convention (get_, list_, create_, delete_) which is correct, but descriptions do not explain WHEN to use each tool or what distinguishes similar operations (e.g., get_item vs list_items). No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) despite clear risk levels. Pagination implemented on list_items but not documented in description.

• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 chars. Example: 'get_item: Retrieve a single item by ID. Use this when you know the item ID; use list_items to search or browse. Returns item name, enabled status, and metadata.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Example for list_items: 'Returns {items: [{id, name, enabled, created_at}], total: int, page: int, page_size: int}'.
• Add descriptions to all parameters. Example: 'page: Page number (1-based, default 1). page_size: Items per page (1-100, default 20).'
• Add tool annotations via rmcp macros: #[tool(readOnlyHint=true)] for get_*, #[tool(destructiveHint=true)] for delete_item, #[tool(idempotentHint=true)] for idempotent operations.
• Implement error recovery guidance. Example: 'delete_item failed: Item not found. Call list_items to verify the item exists, or check the ID format (must be a positive integer).'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry