ForgeAgent exposes 2 file management tools with complete JSON schemas and detailed parameter descriptions in Chinese. Both tools have clear, action-verb names (read_file, write_file) and comprehensive descriptions (200+ chars each) explaining behavior, parameters, and constraints. Schemas include proper type definitions, descriptions, and validation rules (minimum line numbers, max_chars limits). However, output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot predict return structure. Error handling is absent from tool definitions; no guidance on recovery paths. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite write_file being destructive. Parameter descriptions are thorough but lack enum constraints where applicable (e.g., no explicit enum for append boolean). Overall solid parameter quality but incomplete output documentation and missing error patterns.

• Document output schemas for both tools. E.g., read_file returns {content: string, truncated: boolean, char_count: integer}; write_file returns {success: boolean, bytes_written: integer, path: string}.
• Add tool annotations: read_file with readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true; write_file with destructiveHint=true to signal retry safety and side effects.
• Implement confirmation pattern for write_file: add a dry_run parameter (default false) or require explicit confirmation before overwriting existing files.
• Enhance error handling: document expected error cases (FileNotFoundError, PermissionError, EncodingError) and recovery hints in tool descriptions.
• Add formal constraints to parameter descriptions: specify UTF-8 encoding explicitly, clarify 1-indexed line numbering in schema, and document max_chars truncation behavior with example output.