Six tools with reasonable naming (verb_noun pattern) and documented descriptions (100-200 chars), but critical gaps in schema completeness and parameter documentation. Input schemas are present but lack full type definitions for all parameters. Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal (10-30 chars). No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, tools do not guide recovery or categorize failures. Composition is sound (each tool has one responsibility), but missing idempotency guarantees and confirmation patterns for destructive operations (memory_forget, memory_consolidate).

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., memory_search should return {results: [{path, score, line, snippet}], total_count, next_cursor}. This enables LLMs to chain calls and extract required fields.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 chars with context. E.g., 'scope: Memory scope (user=agent-specific, session=conversation-scoped, repository=codebase-wide). Defaults to session.'
• Add dry_run parameter to memory_forget and memory_consolidate. Return what would be deleted/consolidated without persisting. Prevents accidental data loss.
• Implement error categorization: return {error, code, retryable, suggestion}. E.g., 'Memory not found (code: NOT_FOUND, retryable: false, suggestion: Try memory_search() with a partial topic).'
• Consolidate memory_search/memory_get limit parameters. Use a single 'limit' param with min=1, max=100, default=20. Remove 'maxResults' to avoid ambiguity.