Server has 7 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (list_, get_, create_, update_). Descriptions are present but generic (avg ~80 chars, below 194-char baseline). Parameters have types and descriptions, but lack constraints (enums, ranges, patterns). No output schemas documented. Error handling not visible in provided code. Missing idempotency hints and dependency documentation. Moderate quality, functional but not optimized for LLM reasoning.

• Document output schemas for all 7 tools. Example: 'Returns {script_id: string, title: string, files: [{name: string, type: string, source: string}], created_time: ISO8601}'. This enables LLMs to chain tools correctly.
• Expand descriptions to 50 - 200 chars with WHEN/WHY context. E.g., 'Retrieves all source files in a project. Call this to review code before editing, or to understand project structure. Returns file names, types, and full source code.'
• Add enum constraints to parameters. Declare space_type as enum: ['all', 'room', 'dm']. Add min/max to page_size (1 - 100). Add regex pattern to file_name if applicable.
• Add error recovery guidance. E.g., 'If script_id is invalid, call list_script_projects() first to find the correct ID.' Include this in parameter descriptions or error response templates.
• Implement dry-run or confirmation for create_script_project and update_script_content. E.g., add optional 'confirm' parameter or return a confirmation token requiring a second call to commit.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry