Single tool 'nuke_history' has a basic description but critically lacks parameter descriptions and proper schema documentation. The input schema shows only a 'message' parameter with type and description, but no output schema is documented. The tool performs a destructive operation (rewrites git history) with no confirmation mechanism, error recovery guidance, or idempotency guarantees. No tool annotations (destructiveHint) despite being explicitly marked as DESTRUCTIVE. Naming is verb-based but generic; description is 95 chars (within range but minimal). This server would not pass production code review.

• Add explicit output schema: {success: boolean, branch?: string, root_commit?: string, error?: string}. Document each field so LLM knows what to extract.
• Implement confirmation step: add a 'confirm' parameter (boolean, default false) or split into 'preview_nuke_history' (dry-run) + 'execute_nuke_history' (irreversible). Agents should see what will happen before committing.
• Add destructiveHint annotation to tool schema: 'destructiveHint': true. This signals to MCP clients that the tool is high-risk.
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance: 'Not a git repository. Initialize with: git init' or 'Branch deletion failed. Check for uncommitted changes with: git status'.
• Expand 'message' parameter description to ~100 chars: 'The commit message for the new root commit. Typically "Initial commit" or similar. Will be used as the sole commit in the repository history. Supports any valid git commit message.'