A registry and discovery platform for MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers with search, trending, installation, and management capabilities
This MCP server exposes 24 tools for a registry API. Most tools have basic descriptions (50-150 chars) and input schemas with type definitions, but critical gaps undermine quality: (1) Parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely, many params lack explanations of format, constraints, or valid values. (2) Output schemas are not documented; LLMs cannot infer what fields to expect from responses. (3) Error handling is absent, no guidance on recovery, retryability, or actionable error messages. (4) Tool naming is inconsistent: searchServers vs searchServersAdvanced vs getAllServers perform overlapping functions without clear disambiguation. (5) No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) despite clear read/write distinctions. (6) Authentication requirements ('requires authentication', 'requires admin authentication', 'requires sync secret authentication') are mentioned in descriptions but not formalized in the schema or error handling. Baseline: 549 production tools average 194-char descriptions and 100% have param annotations; this server averages ~100 chars and ~40% have param descriptions.
Add a new changelog entry for a server (requires authentication)
Add a server to an existing collection (requires authentication)
Check health status of all servers (requires sync secret authentication)
Compare up to 3 servers side-by-side with their ratings, badges, and maintenance status
Create a new collection for organizing servers (requires authentication)
Create a new deployment guide for a server (requires authentication)
Create a moderation report for a server (requires authentication)
Output schemas not documented. LLMs cannot infer response structure, forcing them to guess what fields are available for downstream tool calls. This breaks tool chaining and increases hallucination risk.
Parameter descriptions are sparse or missing. Many parameters (e.g., 'limit', 'page', 'status', 'tags') lack format constraints, valid value ranges, or usage guidance. LLMs cannot infer whether 'limit' accepts 1-100 or 1-1000.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 52 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Discover and recommend MCP servers based on use case, tech stack, and requirements using Claude AI
Export selected servers to JSON format
Retrieve all MCP servers with optional search and category filtering
Get all servers in a specific collection
Get deployment guides for a specific server
Get pending moderation reports (requires admin authentication)
Get registry statistics including total servers, categories, and category list
Get changelog entries for a specific server
Get detailed information about a specific MCP server by ID
Get servers similar to a specified server by ID
Get registry statistics including total servers, categories, and category list
Get trending MCP servers with ratings and review counts
Get all collections created by a specific user
Import servers from JSON format (requires authentication)
Review and update status of a moderation report (requires admin authentication)
Search for MCP servers by query, category, and limit
Advanced search with filters for servers by search term, category, minimum stars, minimum rating, tags, and status
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tools mention authentication requirements in descriptions but provide no error responses, retryability hints, or actionable messages. LLMs cannot self-correct on failure.
Overlapping tool names without clear disambiguation. searchServers, searchServersAdvanced, and getAllServers all retrieve servers but differ in filtering capability. LLMs waste reasoning cycles deciding between them.
No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint). Despite clear read/write distinctions in the Risk field, these are not formalized in the schema. LLMs cannot determine which tools are safe to retry.