Realm MCP exposes 10 tools with basic naming (verb_noun pattern) and descriptions present. However, critical gaps undermine production readiness: parameter descriptions are minimal (1-2 sentences), input schemas lack detail (no enums, ranges, or format constraints), and output schemas are entirely undocumented. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance, no categorization of retryable vs fatal errors. The tools are well-intentioned (workflow orchestration, human-in-the-loop) but lack the rigor expected of production agent tools. Average tool score: 52/100.

• Document output schema for every tool. Specify field names, types, and structure. E.g., list_workflows should return {workflows: [{id: string, name: string, status: string}], total: number}.
• Add enums and constraints to parameters. E.g., start_run's 'input' param should document expected keys/types; abandon_run should require explicit confirmation or support a dry_run flag.
• Implement tool annotations: mark get_* and list_* with readOnlyHint=true; mark abandon_run, create_workflow, start_run with destructiveHint=true; mark idempotent operations with idempotentHint=true.
• Add error handling guidance. Document common failure modes (e.g., 'workflow_id not found', 'run already completed') and recovery steps (e.g., 'Call list_workflows to find valid IDs').
• Add pagination to list_workflows and get_workflow_protocol. Accept limit (default 20, max 100) and offset/cursor parameters; return total count and next_cursor.