Server has 5 tools with basic descriptions and some parameter schemas, but significant gaps in schema completeness and parameter documentation. All tools are READ_ONLY and well-intentioned, but descriptions lack LLM-optimization guidance (e.g., when to use vs. similar tools). Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal. No output schemas documented. Error handling returns generic messages without recovery guidance. Naming is clear (verb_noun pattern), but composition could be tighter.
公式ニュース記事を取得する。最新のお知らせを返す。
次の試合情報を取得する。日時・対戦相手・会場・キックオフ時間を返す。
選手のブログ記事を取得する。選手名で検索して最新記事を返す。
直近の試合結果を取得する。スコア・得点者・対戦相手を一覧で返す。
指定シーズンの成績サマリーを取得する。全試合の勝敗とシーズン総括を返す。
get_next_match has NO input schema (empty {} object). Tool cannot accept parameters, limiting flexibility.
No output schemas documented for any tool. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract structured data. Responses are free-text markdown, requiring LLM parsing.
Error messages are generic ('試合情報の取得に失敗しました') with no recovery guidance. LLM cannot determine if error is retryable, user-fixable, or fatal.
Descriptions lack LLM-optimization guidance. Missing: when to use this tool vs. similar ones, what data structure is returned, prerequisites. E.g., 'get_recent_matches' vs 'get_next_match' distinction unclear.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 50 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
Parameter descriptions are minimal (10-30 chars). 'count' and 'competition' in get_recent_matches lack guidance on when to use non-default values or how results differ by competition.