Five tools with complete schemas and descriptions, but quality is uneven. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (send_message, list_peers, check_messages, set_summary, set_status). Descriptions are present (avg 140 chars) and explain WHAT and WHEN, but lack actionable error guidance and dependency hints. Parameters are typed with enums where appropriate (priority, status), but descriptions are minimal (avg 30 chars). Output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls. Error handling is absent from tool definitions; the server returns 'not connected' stubs per comments. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint). Composition is sound: each tool has one responsibility, and names are distinct. However, the lack of output documentation and error recovery guidance limits production readiness.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example for send_message: 'Returns {success: boolean, message_id: string, delivered_at: ISO8601, error?: string}'. This enables LLMs to extract IDs for follow-up calls.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50 - 100 chars with format and constraint details. E.g., 'to: Peer identifier, hex pubkey (64 chars), display name, or #channel. If multiple meshes joined, prefix with mesh-slug: (e.g., mesh-1:alice).'
• Add tool annotations: send_message and set_* with destructiveHint=true; list_peers and check_messages with readOnlyHint=true. This signals to agents which calls have side effects.
• Implement list_peers fully or remove it. A stubbed tool that returns 'not yet implemented' wastes agent turns. Either wire the broker's list-peers request or defer the tool until the broker supports it.
• Add error recovery guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'If you receive a 'not connected' error, the mesh broker is unreachable. Check your network and mesh configuration, then retry.'