Server has 7 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (get_file, commit_files, merge_pull_request), which is good. However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars for most tools), parameter descriptions are sparse or missing, and output schemas are not documented. Error handling exists but lacks recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite clear risk levels. Security concerns: commit_files and merge_pull_request are high-risk write operations with minimal validation guidance in descriptions.

• Add tool annotations to all tools: readOnlyHint=true for get_file/compare_refs/compare_and_verify_pr/get_verification_plan/read_operating_guide; destructiveHint=true for commit_files/merge_pull_request. This enables LLM safety reasoning.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Example for get_file: 'Returns {content: string, size: number, encoding: string, lastModified: ISO8601}'. This enables tool chaining.
• Expand parameter descriptions with format/constraint details. E.g., 'ref: Git reference (branch, tag, or commit SHA). Format: alphanumeric + hyphens/underscores, max 255 chars. Example: main, v1.0.0, abc123def456.'
• Add recovery guidance to error responses. E.g., 'File not found at path. Try compare_refs() to verify the branch exists, or list_files() to find the correct path.'
• Split compare_and_verify_pr into two tools: compare_pr (returns diff) and verify_pr (validates safety). This follows single-responsibility principle and lets agents compose them as needed.

Inferred effective spec: 2025-06-18+.

• Relies on Stateful initialize / Mcp-Session-Id (removed; protocol is stateless) - make each request self-contained