ToonGine's memory tools have reasonable naming (verb_noun pattern) and descriptions (100-200 chars), but critical gaps undermine production readiness. Input schemas are visible and typed, but lack enums for constrained fields (memory_type, min_severity). Descriptions omit WHEN to use each tool and prerequisites. No output schema documentation. Error handling is absent, no guidance on what to do if a memory lookup fails or returns empty. The memory_store_decision tool is the only write operation but lacks confirmation/dry-run pattern. Tools are well-composed (single responsibility) but lack pagination despite claiming to search 'months ago' of data. No security model documented (who can access whose memories?). Baseline: 549 production tools average 18-char names (these are 15-20 chars, good) and 194-char descriptions (these are 120-180 chars, acceptable but sparse). 100% of A+ tools document return types; this server documents none.

• Document output schema for all 7 tools. Example: memory_search returns {query, results: int, memories: [{agent, type, content, date, snippet}]}. Include field types and whether fields are always present.
• Convert 'memory_type' parameter to enum: ['mistake', 'decision', 'episodic', 'conversation', 'other']. Add 'min_severity' validation (1-5 range) with error message if out of bounds.
• Add error handling: 'If memory_search returns 0 results, try broadening the query or removing filters. If memory_store_decision fails with "permission denied", verify agent has write access to the memory store.'
• Implement pagination: add 'offset' and 'total_count' to memory_search, memory_recall, memory_decisions responses. Cap default limit at 20-50 items. Document in descriptions.
• Add dry-run support to memory_store_decision: accept optional 'dry_run: bool' parameter. When true, validate and return what would be stored without persisting. Prevents accidental irreversible writes.