Server has 13 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. All tools have descriptions (10-100 chars, mostly 50-80 chars), which is acceptable. Input schemas are present and properly typed with required fields. However, output schemas are completely undocumented, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract results. Parameter descriptions are minimal (e.g., 'Ethereum address' repeated 8 times). No error handling guidance, no recovery paths, no pagination for list-like tools. Tool naming is verb-first and clear (get_*, create_*, approve_*, broadcast_*), which is good. Composition is reasonable, tools are single-purpose. But the server lacks the depth expected of production tools: no field-level descriptions, no constraints (e.g., valid address format), no guidance on when to use similar tools (e.g., simulate_transaction vs estimate_gas), and no documentation of side effects or idempotency.

• Document output schemas for all 13 tools. Include field names, types, and descriptions. Example: get_balance should return {balance: string (wei), address: string, network: string}.
• Add format constraints to address parameters: 'Ethereum address (0x-prefixed, 40 hex chars, checksummed)'. Use regex pattern in schema and description text.
• Implement pagination for list-returning tools (get_transactions, get_token_balances, detect_risky_approvals). Add limit (default 20, max 100) and offset/cursor parameters. Document in descriptions.
• Add error recovery guidance: 'If broadcast fails with "nonce too low", retry with incremented nonce. If "insufficient funds", call get_balance() first.' Use pattern:recovery-guide.
• Implement confirmation flow for irreversible operations. broadcast_transaction should return a draft_id requiring explicit approve_broadcast before execution, or integrate Multi Round-Trip Requests (result: 'input_required') for user confirmation.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry