Server has 4 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions, but quality is inconsistent. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (pack_*, read_*, search_*, list_*), which is good. However, descriptions lack LLM-optimization guidance (e.g., no 'when to use' or 'prerequisites'), parameter descriptions are minimal, and output schemas are not documented. Error handling exists but lacks recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint). The pack_repository tool is high-risk (WRITE) but has no confirmation pattern or dry-run option.

• Add output schema documentation to all tools. E.g., pack_repository returns {success: bool, output_file: str, file_size: int, token_estimate: int, error?: str}. Document what fields agents should expect.
• Enhance descriptions with LLM-optimization: add 'When to use' and 'Prerequisites' sections. E.g., 'Call pack_repository first to generate output, then use read_packed_output or search_packed_output to analyze.'
• Implement tool annotations: mark read_packed_output, search_packed_output, list_supported_formats with readOnlyHint=true; mark pack_repository with destructiveHint=true (overwrites files).
• Add dry-run support to pack_repository. Accept a 'dry_run' boolean parameter that returns estimated output size and token count without writing files. Enables agent preview before commit.
• Improve error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Repository path does not exist: /path/to/repo. Verify the path is correct and readable.' instead of bare error strings.