Three tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation, output schema clarity, and error handling. Tool names lack action verbs (list_keywords, read_keyword_docs, run_keyword are acceptable but generic). Descriptions are present but minimal (34-89 chars, below the 194-char baseline). Critical issue: run_keyword accepts arbitrary args/kwargs with no validation, type constraints, or error guidance. No output schemas documented. Parameters lack detailed constraints (e.g., what args/kwargs are valid?). No error recovery guidance. Composition is weak: run_keyword is a generic dispatcher that could mask failures.

• Document output schemas for all tools. list_keywords returns list[str]; read_keyword_docs returns str; run_keyword returns dict or structured object with success/failure/result fields.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100 - 200 chars. Include WHEN to use each tool: 'Call list_keywords first to discover available FlaUI keywords. Use read_keyword_docs to learn argument patterns before calling run_keyword.'
• Add enum or pattern constraints to run_keyword args/kwargs. Document valid keyword names (reference list_keywords output), expected argument types, and common kwargs. E.g., 'args: list of strings matching FlaUI keyword argument types (window handles, element xpaths, etc.)'
• Implement error handling with recovery guidance. Catch FlaUI exceptions and return structured errors: {success: false, error: 'Keyword not found', suggestion: 'Call list_keywords() to see available keywords'}.
• Add parameter descriptions to read_keyword_docs 'name' param: 'The FlaUI keyword name (string). Use "__intro__" for library overview. Call list_keywords() to discover available keywords.'