Four tools with clear names and reasonable descriptions, but significant gaps in schema completeness and parameter documentation. ask_pipeworx and get_connection_config have minimal input schemas (single string params with no type constraints). discover_tools has better structure but lacks output schema documentation. pipeworx_feedback has the most complete schema with enum constraints on 'type' field. No tools document return types or pagination behavior. Descriptions are adequate (100-200 chars) but lack actionable guidance on when to use each tool vs. alternatives. Error handling and recovery paths not documented.

• Add enum constraint to get_connection_config 'client' param: {"enum": ["Claude", "Cursor", "Windsurf", "Gemini CLI", "Perplexity", "other"]}
• Document discover_tools output schema: array of {tool_name, description, input_schema, data_freshness, rank}. Specify max result count (10 default) and pagination behavior.
• Add min/max bounds to discover_tools 'limit' param: minimum 1, maximum 50, default 10. Include in description: 'Maximum number of tools to return (1-50, default 10)'.
• Document ask_pipeworx return type: {matched: boolean, answer?: string, contact?: string}. Clarify what LLM should do when matched=false.
• Add parameter descriptions to all tools. E.g., ask_pipeworx 'question' should state: 'Natural language question about Pipeworx features, pricing, connectivity, or reliability. Questions outside FAQ scope return matched:false.'