OMO Suites exhibits significant definition quality gaps across all dimensions. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (omocs_profile_list, omocs_task_create) but descriptions are uniformly terse (10-30 chars), well below the 50-200 char baseline for LLM-optimized tools. Only 5 of 19 tools have visible input schemas; 14 tools lack documented parameters entirely. No output schemas are documented. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance, categorization, or actionable error messages. The codebase shows tool registration in separate files (profile.ts, agent.ts, etc.) but actual schema definitions are not visible in the provided source, forcing inference and capping per-tool scores at 50 maximum.

• Expand all tool descriptions to 50-200 characters. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it (vs similar tools), and what it returns. E.g., 'List all available profiles for the current workspace. Call this first to see available options before switching profiles with omocs_profile_switch.'
• Document input and output schemas for all 19 tools. For omocs_task_create, specify: input {title: string, description: string, ...}, output {task_id: string, created_at: ISO8601, ...}. Ensure output includes IDs needed for chaining (e.g., task_id for omocs_task_update).
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions of write tools. E.g., omocs_profile_switch: 'If profile not found, call omocs_profile_list to see available options. If switch fails, check workspace permissions.'
• Implement confirmation or dry-run for destructive operations. omocs_init_deep should accept a --dry-run flag or require explicit confirmation before generating AGENTS.md.
• Add parameter descriptions and constraints. For omocs_task_update, document which fields are updatable, required vs optional, and format constraints (e.g., 'updates: object with keys from {title, description, status, assignee}').