SSB for Agents exhibits significant quality gaps across naming, descriptions, and schemas. While 31 tools are defined, most lack actionable descriptions (many under 50 chars), parameter schemas are minimal or absent, and output structures are undocumented. Tool names are inconsistent: some follow verb_noun (get_market_registry, place_bet), others are vague (ask, scan, smart_bet). Critical tools like place_bet and manage_hidden_bets lack input validation guidance. No tool declares output schema. Error handling is absent from descriptions. The server prioritizes breadth (31 tools) over depth (quality per tool). Average tool score: 38/100.

• Rename vague tools: 'ask' → 'query_betting_analysis', 'scan' → 'scan_market_opportunities', 'smart_bet' → 'get_smart_bet_recommendation'. Use verb_noun consistently.
• Expand all descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHEN to use (vs similar tools), WHAT it returns, and any prerequisites. E.g., 'Get consensus sharp money positions for a league/market. Call this after screen_ranked to validate edge. Returns: positions array with confidence tiers and movement history.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify returned fields, types, and which IDs chain to downstream tools. E.g., today() returns [{game_id, league, odds, book, ...}] so place_bet can accept game_id.
• Add confirmation/dry-run to destructive tools. place_bet should accept dry_run=true; manage_hidden_bets should require explicit action enum (list|add|remove) with validation.
• Add parameter enums and constraints. E.g., manage_hidden_bets.action: enum [list, add, remove]; staking_plan.picks: array of {tier: enum [high, medium, low], stake: number 1-1000}.