Mixed quality across 9 tools. Naming is generally clear and verb-based (database_schema, get_user_profile, create_skill). Descriptions are present but often generic, most lack actionable context about when to use the tool or what happens on error. Schemas are visible for all tools with proper type definitions, but parameter descriptions are minimal (1-2 words). Output schemas are not documented. Error handling is absent, no guidance on retryability, user-fixable vs fatal errors, or recovery paths. Database tools lack pagination/limit parameters despite being query-facing. Write tools (save_user_profile, create_skill, create_agent) have no confirmation or dry-run support despite modifying state.

• Document return types for all 9 tools. Example: 'Returns {success: bool, data: {schema_name: string, tables: [{name: string, columns: [...]}]}, error?: string}'.
• Expand parameter descriptions to include format, range, and constraints. E.g., 'schema (optional): Schema name as string, 2-50 chars, alphanumeric + underscore. If omitted, returns all schemas.'
• Add error handling guidance to database_schema and database_query. E.g., 'On SQL error: returns {success: false, error: string}. If permission denied, user must request access. If timeout, retry with smaller LIMIT.'
• Add limit and offset parameters to database_query with defaults (limit=100, offset=0). Document in description: 'Results capped at 1000 rows; use offset for pagination.'
• Implement confirmation pattern for write tools: add a 'confirm' boolean parameter (default false) or split into preview + execute steps. E.g., create_agent with confirm=false returns a preview; confirm=true executes.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry