Single tool with adequate schema but weak descriptions. Tool name 'load_topo' lacks action verb clarity (should be 'parse_topo' or 'load_ensp_topology'). Description is 400+ chars, excessive for LLM parsing, buries key intent. Parameter 'folder_path' has minimal description (18 chars). No output schema documented. No error handling guidance for common failures (missing .topo, invalid paths, zip extraction errors). Tool definition is explicit and visible in code, but lacks production-grade polish.
加载 eNSP 拓扑项目,自动解析拓扑结构、设备配置和连接关系。 用法:传入 eNSP 拓扑项目所在的文件夹路径(包含 .topo 文件的文件夹), 系统将自动: 1. 解析 .topo XML 获取设备清单和拓扑连接关系 2. 遍历 UUID 子文件夹,从 flash.efz/vrpcfg.zip 中提取设备配置 3. 裁剪空接口和默认配置,减少冗余信息 4. 返回结构化上下文供诊断分析 示例:C:\Users\ookini\Desktop\ensp\路由交换技术\单臂路由\单臂路由
Tool name lacks action verb. 'load_topo' is ambiguous, does it load, parse, analyze, or fetch? Rename to 'parse_ensp_topology' or 'extract_topology_config' to clarify intent.
Description exceeds 400 chars and mixes usage instructions with functional details. LLMs struggle to extract intent from verbose descriptions. Trim to 150 chars: 'Parse eNSP topology project folder, extract device configs and connections. Returns structured network context for diagnostics.'
Parameter 'folder_path' description is 18 chars, below 20-char minimum. Expand to: 'Absolute path to eNSP project folder containing .topo file and UUID device subdirectories.'
No output schema documented. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations without knowing returned fields (device list, topology structure, config format). Add explicit schema: {type: object, properties: {devices: [...], connections: [...], errors: [...]}}.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 47 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Error handling returns raw exception messages ('加载拓扑时出错: {e}'). LLMs cannot act on unstructured errors. Categorize as retryable (network, timeout) vs user-fixable (missing file, invalid path) with recovery guidance.