Loading ToolBench
A generic MCP SSE <-> Stdio bridge with advanced security and SSL/TLS support.
Single tool 'wrapped_command_tool' has critical definition gaps. Input schema is present but minimal: only 'subcommand' (string) with a generic description 'Arguments to pass to the command.' No output schema documented. Description lacks WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, prerequisites, or state-modification warnings. No parameter constraints (enums, patterns, ranges). No error handling guidance. Tool accepts arbitrary CLI commands with security validation, but this critical context is absent from the definition. Naming is generic ('wrapped_command_tool') and does not follow verb_noun convention. Per-tool score: 28/100.
Dynamically wraps standard CLI utilities as MCP tools. Accepts a subcommand argument and executes it with security validation including forbidden/allowed args and patterns.
Tool description is incomplete and generic. Does not explain WHAT the tool does (wraps CLI utilities), WHEN to use it, or that it modifies state via command execution. LLMs cannot determine when to select this tool vs alternatives.
No output schema documented. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations or extract results. Tool returns command output but structure is undefined.
Input parameter 'subcommand' lacks constraints, format specification, or examples. Description is one sentence. No guidance on allowed/forbidden patterns, argument syntax, or security boundaries.
Tool name 'wrapped_command_tool' is generic and does not follow verb_noun convention (e.g., 'execute_command', 'run_cli_tool'). LLMs cannot infer intent from the name alone.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 32 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
No error handling guidance. Tool accepts security validation (forbidden/allowed args) but does not document what errors are returned, how to recover, or what invalid inputs look like.