InkPaw provides 17 tools with mostly complete schemas and descriptions, but quality is inconsistent. Tool names follow verb_noun convention well (create_document, update_node, delete_nodes). Descriptions are present but often verbose and written in Chinese with technical jargon that may confuse LLMs unfamiliar with the domain. Parameter descriptions exist but lack clarity on constraints, formats, and valid ranges. Output schemas are not explicitly documented in the source. Error handling guidance is minimal. The server demonstrates solid foundational structure but falls short of production-grade clarity expected for A-tier tools.

• Rewrite all tool descriptions in English, 50-200 characters, action-oriented. Example: 'create_document' → 'Create a new DOCX document from a structured definition. Returns docId and validation issues. Use get_outline to inspect structure before rendering.'
• Document output schemas explicitly in tool descriptions or a separate schema reference. Include field names, types, and nesting. Example: 'Returns {docId: string, issues: [{level: error|warn, message: string}]}'.
• Add JSON Schema constraints: minLength/maxLength for strings, enum for preset/section, pattern for docId (UUID format). Move validation rules from description text into formal schema.
• Add confirmation/dry-run support for destructive tools (delete_nodes, delete_template). Example: add 'dryRun: boolean' parameter to preview what will be deleted before committing.
• Enhance discovery tool descriptions to guide LLM sequencing. Example: 'list_presets' → 'List available document style presets. Call this first to see options before create_document. Returns [{name, description}].'
• Document parameter dependencies explicitly. E.g., 'If baseDir is relative, it resolves relative to the server process cwd. If imagesDir is omitted, defaults to baseDir itself.' This prevents silent failures.