Single tool 'lint_constitution' has a well-written description (186 chars, within 10-1024 baseline) explaining what it does and when to use it. Input schema is present with proper JSON Schema structure and a single required parameter 'content' with type string and description. However, the tool name lacks a clear action verb (lint is weak; 'check_constitution' or 'validate_constitution' would be stronger). No output schema is documented, the response structure is not visible in the source, making it impossible for LLMs to plan downstream actions. Error handling is not evident in the provided code. The tool is READ_ONLY (good security posture) but lacks tool annotations (readOnlyHint) to declare this formally. Overall, the tool is functional but incomplete by production standards.

• Document the complete output schema (e.g., list of check results with name, status, reason fields; summary counts). Include example response structure.
• Rename tool to 'check_constitution' or 'validate_constitution' for clearer action semantics. 'lint' is domain jargon; action verbs help LLM selection.
• Add readOnlyHint: true to tool definition to formally declare this tool does not modify state.
• Add error handling documentation: describe what happens on empty input, invalid markdown, or oversized files. Provide recovery guidance (e.g., 'Try splitting the file into sections').
• Add a max_length constraint to the 'content' parameter (e.g., 1MB) and document it in the parameter description.