Four tools with basic descriptions but significant schema and parameter documentation gaps. Tool names lack action verbs (status, active, dataview, base are nouns or domain-specific terms). Two tools (status, active) have no visible input schemas. The dataview and base tools have partial schemas but lack comprehensive parameter descriptions. No error handling guidance, no output schema documentation, and no tool annotations. Descriptions are present but generic (10-50 chars for status/active). This is a typical community server with functional tools but insufficient LLM-optimization.

• Rename tools with action verbs: status → get_plugin_status, active → get_active_file, dataview → execute_dataview_query, base → execute_base_query. This matches the verb_noun baseline (90% of A+ tools start with action verbs).
• Add explicit output schemas to all tools. Document what fields are returned (e.g., status returns {pluginId, version, vaultName, readyTimestamp}). This enables LLMs to chain calls and extract required data.
• Expand descriptions to 50-200 chars (baseline average 194 chars). For status: 'Returns the plugin's operational state including version, vault name, and startup timestamp. Call this first to verify the plugin is ready.' For active: 'Retrieves the currently open file in the Obsidian editor, including path, cursor position, and selected text. Use this to understand the user's current context.'
• Add parameter descriptions to base tool: clarify that 'file' and 'yaml' are mutually exclusive; explain what 'view' does (which view within the .base file to execute); document expected YAML structure.
• Add error handling guidance. E.g., dataview: 'If query syntax is invalid, returns error with line number. If source file not found, returns error suggesting available files.' This guides LLM recovery.