Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool definitions lack proper schemas, descriptions are vague or missing parameter details, and error handling is absent. No input validation or recovery guidance. Tools accept free-form natural language intent strings instead of structured parameters. The server conflates tool logic with NL parsing, violating separation of concerns. No pagination, no output schema documentation, and no security controls (e.g., RBAC, audit logging). This is a prototype, not production-ready.

• Replace 'intent' string parameter with structured inputs. E.g., resource_patch should accept {deployment_name: string, memory_limit: string (enum: Ki|Mi|Gi), memory_request?: string} instead of parsing 'patch' keyword from free-form text.
• Add output schemas to all tools. Document return type as {status: 'success'|'error', data?: {...}, error?: {code: string, message: string, recovery_hint: string}}. Enable LLM to extract and chain results.
• Implement error classification. Return {error_type: 'retryable'|'user_fixable'|'fatal', message: '...', recovery_hint: '...'} so LLM knows whether to retry, ask user, or abort.
• Add RBAC and audit logging. Gate destructive tools (patch, restart, rollback) behind permission checks. Log caller, tool, parameters, timestamp, and result for compliance.
• Implement dry-run for write operations. Add optional 'dry_run: boolean' parameter to resource_patch, restart_deployment, rollback_deployment. Return what would change without applying it.