This server exposes only 2 tools with minimal definitions. Both tools have basic descriptions (40-50 chars) and identical input schemas (single 'path' string parameter). Descriptions lack context on when to use each tool, what happens on invocation, or error recovery. No output schemas documented. Parameter descriptions are generic ('The file system path to open'). No error handling guidance, no validation rules, no idempotent/destructive hints. Tools are READ_ONLY but lack explicit annotations. The server is primarily a dashboard UI; MCP tool exposure appears secondary and underdeveloped.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Explain: 'Opens the specified folder in the system file explorer. Use this to navigate to a project directory or reveal files in the OS UI. Returns success or error if the path is invalid or inaccessible.'
• Document output schema: { success: boolean, message?: string, path?: string }. This lets LLMs know what to expect and whether the operation succeeded.
• Add parameter validation rules to the 'path' description: 'Absolute or relative file system path. Must exist and be readable. Supports Windows, macOS, and Linux paths.'
• Add error handling guidance: 'If the path does not exist, returns error 'Path not found'. If access is denied, returns 'Permission denied'. Suggest checking the path or permissions.'
• Add tool annotations in the MCP registration: mark both tools with readOnlyHint=true to signal to LLMs that these are safe, non-destructive operations.