All 7 tools suffer from severely underdeveloped schemas and descriptions. Every tool accepts a single generic 'input' parameter (type: string, description: 'Input data (JSON)') with no structure, validation, or guidance. Descriptions are 1 - 3 words, far below the 10 - 1024 character baseline (avg 194 chars for A+ tools). No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. Tools are thin proxies to a remote Bankr API with no value-add validation, pagination, or result shaping. This server reads as a proof-of-concept, not production-ready.

• Replace generic 'input: string' parameter with explicit, typed fields. E.g., equipment_compare should accept {equipment_id_1: string, equipment_id_2: string, comparison_type: enum['specs', 'price', 'performance']} with descriptions for each field.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50 - 150 characters. Example: 'equipment_compare: Compare two pieces of industrial equipment side-by-side on specifications, price, and performance. Returns a structured comparison table with differences highlighted.'
• Document output schemas for each tool. Specify what fields are returned (e.g., equipment_id returns {id, name, manufacturer, model, specs: {...}, confidence_score}). This enables LLMs to extract and chain results.
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. Instead of {status: 'error', error: 'Network timeout'}, return {status: 'error', error: 'Network timeout. Retry in 5 seconds or check Bankr API status at status.bankr.bot'}.
• Move wallet address and base URL to environment variables (BANKR_WALLET, BANKR_BASE_URL). Add request logging with timestamp, tool name, and user/agent ID for audit trails.