This server has 4 tools with significant definition gaps. Tool names lack clear action verbs (download_sharepoint_stream vs get_sharepoint_video). Descriptions are present but generic (194-char baseline; these average ~150 chars, acceptable length but lack WHEN/WHY context). Input schemas ARE visible with types and descriptions, which is positive. However, NO output schemas are documented, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract results. Parameters lack enums where appropriate (e.g., 'out_dir' should validate path safety). Error handling is absent, no guidance on retryability, user-fixable vs fatal errors, or recovery paths. Security concern: cookies passed as file paths (good) but no validation that paths don't traverse outside intended directories. Overall: definitions exist but lack production rigor.

• Add explicit output schemas for all tools. E.g., download_sharepoint_stream returns {success: bool, file_path: string, size_mb: number, duration_seconds: number, error?: string}. This enables LLMs to chain tools and extract results.
• Rename benchmark_context → measure_agent_context_benchmark and check_template → validate_template_structure. Use verb_noun pattern consistently.
• Add error handling guidance to each tool description. E.g., 'If download fails with timeout, check network connectivity and retry. If cookies file is invalid, regenerate using browser DevTools.' Include retryability classification.
• Document path parameter constraints: 'cookies must be a valid Netscape-format file (absolute or relative path, no traversal). out_dir must be writable and exist or be creatable.' Add validation in tool implementation.
• Expand parameter descriptions with format/range hints. E.g., 'url: SharePoint Stream web URL (https://...) or videomanifest URL. Must be accessible with provided cookies.' Enrich 'scenario' param with valid scenario IDs or discovery hint.