Server has 5 well-named, read-only tools with clear descriptions (avg 85 chars). All tools have documented input schemas with types and descriptions. However, output schemas are inferred from Python type hints rather than explicitly documented in descriptions. Parameter descriptions are present but lack constraint details (enums, ranges, formats). No error handling guidance or recovery paths documented. Missing tool annotations (readOnlyHint present implicitly via risk:READ_ONLY, but not in schema). Naming follows verb_noun pattern well (search_*, get_*, list_). No security issues detected (read-only, no secrets). Composition is sound, tools chain logically (search → get_topic, list_categories → get_latest_topics).

• Add explicit output schema documentation to each tool description. Example: 'Returns SearchResults with fields: query (string), total_posts (integer), posts (array of {id, topic_id, username, created_at, blurb, topic_title, url, like_count})'.
• Convert parameter value lists to JSON Schema enums. Change 'period' description from 'one of "daily", "weekly", ...' to schema enum: ["daily", "weekly", "monthly", "quarterly", "yearly", "all"].
• Add numeric bounds to parameters: max_posts (1 - 100), page (0 - 1000), limit (1 - 50). State in description: 'Maximum 100 posts per call; use pagination for larger result sets.'
• Add readOnlyHint: true to all tool schemas to signal safety to LLMs. Example: {"type": "object", "properties": {...}, "readOnlyHint": true}.
• Document pagination behavior: 'Returns up to 20 topics per page. Use page parameter (0-indexed) to fetch subsequent pages. If fewer than 20 results returned, you have reached the end.'