Two tools with solid naming (verb_noun pattern), comprehensive parameter schemas with types and descriptions, and documented output structures. Tool descriptions are clear and actionable (150-250 chars). Parameters include proper constraints (enums, min/max bounds). Error handling delegates to _error() helper with context-aware messages. Main gaps: no batch operations, limited guidance on chaining between tools, and response_format parameter appears in both tools but could be abstracted. Schemas are well-formed JSON Schema with proper field typing.

• Extract response_format into a server-level configuration option or middleware so it does not clutter every tool's parameter list
• Add a kit_search_modules_batch or kit_get_modules_batch tool accepting an array of module identifiers to reduce multi-call overhead
• Document the precedence and fallback logic for kit_get_module's 'module' parameter: 'Try identifier first (M-ETIT-101156), then GUID (0x...), then full URL. If none match, return available search suggestions.'
• Expand error messages to be self-contained: instead of 'Try search_users()', say 'No matching modules found. Refine your search with fewer keywords or check the exact module identifier.'
• Formalize output schemas as JSON Schema objects in tool registration (if the MCP SDK supports it) so LLMs can parse expected fields without reading docstrings