Prism Agentic has 15 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant quality gaps prevent production readiness. Most tools have descriptions (13/15), but they are generic and lack actionable context for LLM selection. Parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely. No output schemas are documented. Error handling is absent. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (good), but descriptions fail to explain WHEN to use each tool or what distinguishes similar operations (e.g., project.update vs project.updateModel). The health and notifyOwner tools have minimal descriptions (<50 chars). Task and project tools lack parameter constraints (enums, ranges). No evidence of pagination support despite list operations. Security concerns: no visible permission gates or audit logging.

• Document output schemas for all 15 tools. Include field names, types, and descriptions. Example: project.list should return {projects: [{id, name, description, modelId, createdAt}], total: number}.
• Expand descriptions to 100-200 chars. Add WHEN/WHY context. Example: 'Update a project's name, description, or LLM model. Use this after project.get to modify settings. Returns updated project details.' vs current 'Update an existing project's name, description, or model selection'.
• Add parameter descriptions and constraints. Example: 'id: numeric project ID (1-999999)' and 'modelId: valid LLM model ID (enum: gpt-4, gpt-3.5-turbo, claude-3-opus, etc.)'.
• Add pagination to project.list and task.list: limit (1-100, default 20), offset (0+), and return total count. Document in description: 'Returns paginated results; use offset/limit for large datasets.'
• Implement confirmation pattern for project.delete: add optional 'confirm: true' parameter and return error 'Destructive operation requires confirm=true' if omitted. Add audit logging for all write operations.