TokenHub has 6 tools with visible schemas and descriptions, but quality is inconsistent. Tool names lack clear action verbs (discover_capabilities, run_workflow are vague). Descriptions exist but are brief (10-50 chars for most). The run_workflow tool is a massive catch-all with 20+ parameters, violating single-responsibility principle. Parameter descriptions are minimal or missing context. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent from tool definitions. Security concerns: API keys exposed as parameters (apiKey in run_workflow, retrieve_context). No pagination guidance despite tools returning lists. Overall, definitions are skeletal, sufficient to invoke but insufficient for LLM reasoning.

• Split run_workflow into 6 separate tools: validate_command, filesystem_action, git_action, answer_from_web, resolve_request, project_scan. Each tool should have only the parameters it needs.
• Move apiKey and token parameters to server-side configuration. Inject credentials via environment variables or vault. Remove from tool parameters entirely.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., discover_capabilities should return {results: [{name, description, category}], total_count}. read_resource should return {content, line_count, uri}.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHEN to use (e.g., 'Call this first to discover available workflows'), WHAT it returns, and any prerequisites (e.g., 'Requires git repository at root').
• Add min/max bounds to numeric parameters (limit: 1-100, budgetTokens: 1-1000000). Add enum constraints to string parameters (mode: snippet|range|full). Add format hints to complex params (connectionString: 'postgresql://user:pass@host/db').