Six tools with basic descriptions and partial schemas. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (status, start_pairing, submit_pin, get_otp, save_password, get_password), which is good. However, descriptions are minimal (10-60 chars), parameter descriptions are sparse or missing, and output schemas are not documented. No error handling guidance, no parameter constraints (enums, ranges), and no indication of idempotency or retry safety. The server exposes sensitive operations (save_password, get_password) without documented permission gates or confirmation patterns. Parameter types are present but descriptions are often absent or trivial.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Example: 'status' → 'Check the daemon, browser extension, and pairing state. Returns {daemon_running: bool, extension_loaded: bool, paired: bool, pairing_state: string|null}. Call this first to verify the system is ready before attempting pairing or credential operations.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Add a 'Returns' section to each description listing field names, types, and meanings. E.g., get_password returns [{url, username, password, created_date}].
• Add parameter constraints and format hints. For 'url' params, specify: 'Full URL (https://example.com) or domain (example.com). Used to match saved credentials.'
• Implement permission gates and audit logging for save_password and get_password. Gate access behind a --allow-passwords flag (already mentioned in get_password description) and log all credential access with timestamp and caller.
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions. E.g., submit_pin: 'Returns error if PIN is invalid or timeout expires. If pairing fails, call start_pairing again to restart the handshake.'