Server has 9 well-named, read-only tools with consistent pagination patterns. All tools have descriptions (avg 120 chars) and input schemas with types. However, output schemas are not documented in the source code, parameter descriptions lack actionable constraints (e.g., no format hints for 'slug'), and error handling is absent. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, etc.) despite all being read-only. Naming follows verb_noun convention well (list_, search_, find_, get_). Schemas use Zod validation internally but JSON Schema output not visible. Missing: output field documentation, error recovery guidance, and per-parameter format constraints.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Include field names, types, and which fields (e.g., 'id', 'slug') enable chaining to other tools. Example: 'Returns {id: number, slug: string, role: string, location: string, avatarUrl: string, ...}'.
• Add readOnlyHint annotation to all 9 tools in tool registration. This signals to clients that these are safe, idempotent reads.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format constraints. E.g., 'slug: Portfolio slug identifier (lowercase alphanumeric and hyphens, 3-50 chars)' instead of just 'Portfolio slug identifier'.
• Add error recovery hints to get_creative_profile and get_creative_full_details. E.g., 'If slug not found, try search_creatives() with a partial name or role.'
• Consider moving find_creatives and find_requests filtering to backend query parameters (role, location, category, status) to reduce bandwidth and improve accuracy on large datasets.