Server has 10 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions visible in src/index.ts. However, critical gaps limit production readiness: (1) Most tool descriptions lack actionable context, they state WHAT but not WHEN or WHY to use each tool. E.g., 'Verify that no data is stored locally' is vague; does it check runtime state, filesystem, or network logs? (2) No output schemas documented, LLMs cannot predict response structure for downstream chaining. (3) Tools 6 - 10 (verify_data_privacy, get_privacy_statement, audit_data_retention, generate_compliance_report, secure_wipe_session) appear to be meta/assurance tools rather than core redaction functionality, inflating the tool count without adding domain value. (4) Parameter descriptions lack format/constraint details, e.g., encryptionKey says '64-character hex string' but no validation guidance. (5) No error handling patterns visible, tools do not guide recovery (e.g., 'If encryption fails, try generate_encryption_key first'). Naming is solid (verb_noun pattern, clear intent), but composition and output design are weak.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., redact_healthcare_data should return {redacted_data: string, redaction_count: number, categories_redacted: string[], format: string}. This enables LLMs to chain tools and extract the right fields.
• Rewrite descriptions to include WHEN and WHY. E.g., 'Analyze healthcare data for PHI risk without redacting. Call this first to assess exposure before deciding whether to redact. Returns risk score (0 - 100) and detected PHI categories.' This guides agent planning.
• Add format/constraint details to parameter descriptions. E.g., encryptionKey: 'A 64-character hexadecimal string (0-9, a-f). Generate one with generate_encryption_key. If invalid, returns error: Invalid encryption key format.'
• Implement error recovery guidance. E.g., if redact_healthcare_data fails with 'Unsupported format', return: 'Input format not recognized. Supported: JSON, XML, plain text. Ensure input is valid before retrying. Call analyze_phi_risk to validate structure first.'
• Consolidate meta/assurance tools. Merge verify_data_privacy, audit_data_retention, and get_privacy_statement into a single 'get_privacy_audit' tool with optional parameters (include_audit, detailed_report, format). This reduces cognitive load and improves composability.