Two tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation, output schema specification, and error handling guidance. Tool names lack clear action verbs (extract_part_ids vs extract_parts, verify_cross_reference vs verify_parts). Descriptions are present but generic (194 chars baseline; these are ~120-180 chars). Parameters lack type constraints and validation rules. No output schemas documented. No error recovery guidance. This server falls in the D (Poor) range, most descriptions present but incomplete, schemas lack rigor, no error handling patterns.

• Add explicit output schema for each tool. E.g., extract_part_ids returns {"parts": [{"id": string, "type": string, "source_page": number}], "total_count": number}. Document in tool description.
• Add parameter constraints: document_chunk max length (e.g., 10000 chars), extracted_parts array max items (e.g., 100). Include in parameter descriptions.
• Rename verify_cross_reference to verify_parts_against_master for clarity. Add description: 'Cross-references extracted part IDs against the Excel master book. Returns anomalies, discrepancies, and confidence scores. Call after extract_part_ids.'
• Add error handling guidance: 'If no parts extracted, return {"parts": [], "message": "No part IDs found. Check document format or try a different chunk."}' and similar for verify tool.
• Document the workflow in tool descriptions: extract_part_ids is a discovery tool; verify_cross_reference is a validation tool. Clarify that verify requires output from extract.