CiCy Desktop provides 28 tools with complete JSON schemas and basic descriptions, but quality is inconsistent. Naming follows verb_noun convention (get_, set_, list_, electron_, cdp_, clipboard_) which is good. However, descriptions are often terse (10-50 chars) and lack context about when to use each tool or what happens on failure. Many parameter descriptions are minimal. Tool composition is reasonable (account management, automation, CDP, clipboard as separate concerns), but error handling guidance is absent, tools do not explain recovery paths or categorize failures. Output schemas are not documented. The server uses STDIO transport, which is a hard cap at 50 regardless of definition quality.

• Expand tool descriptions to 50-150 characters. Include: what the tool does, when to use it (vs similar tools), and what it returns. E.g., 'electron_click: Click a DOM element by CSS selector. Use when you need to interact with buttons, links, or form controls. Returns success/failure and error details if element not found.'
• Document output schemas for every tool. Add a 'Returns' section to each description listing key fields and types. E.g., 'Returns: {success: boolean, error?: string, elementFound: boolean}'.
• Add error handling guidance. Describe common failure modes and recovery steps. E.g., 'If selector not found: verify CSS selector syntax, wait for element to load, or use electron_wait_for first.'
• Clarify parameter semantics. Explain win_id (window/tab identifier), selector (CSS selector syntax), and timeout units. Add constraints: 'waitTimeout: 1-60000 ms (default 5000)'.
• Add tool composition hints. E.g., 'electron_wait_for should be called before electron_click if element may not be immediately visible.' This guides multi-step planning.