Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool definitions lack visible input schemas in the provided source code, cannot verify parameter types, descriptions, or constraints. No tool descriptions are visible in the sample code provided. The 7 tools appear to be registered in separate files (activities.ts, health.ts, training.ts) but the actual schema definitions are not shown. Without access to the complete tool registration code, per-tool scoring is severely constrained. Naming follows verb_noun convention (get_*, export_*) which is positive, but this alone cannot compensate for missing schemas and descriptions.
No input schemas visible in provided source code. Cannot verify parameter types, constraints, or descriptions for any tool.
No tool descriptions visible in provided source code. LLMs cannot determine when or why to select each tool.
Tool definitions inferred from file names and registration calls, but actual schema code not provided. Cannot verify parameter types, enums, or output structure.
Inferred effective spec: 2026-07-28+.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 26 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No error handling guidance visible. LLMs cannot determine what to do if a tool call fails (retry, ask user, or abort).
No output schema documentation visible. LLMs cannot plan downstream tool calls or extract required fields from responses.