Server provides 6 tools with basic schemas and descriptions. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (get_*, list_*, enable_*). However, descriptions are inconsistent in depth, some lack context on when to use them. Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal (avg ~40 chars). Output schemas are not documented in the source code provided. Error handling and recovery guidance are absent. The dynamic toolset pattern (enable_toolset, list_available_toolsets, get_toolset_tools) is novel but adds complexity without clear LLM guidance on when to invoke these discovery tools vs. direct tools.

• Document output schemas for all tools. For get_me, specify fields returned (login, id, name, email, bio, etc.). For get_teams, return array of {name, slug, description, permission}. For discovery tools, return structured lists with counts and metadata.
• Enhance discovery tool descriptions with workflow guidance: 'Call list_available_toolsets to see all available GitHub tool categories. If the currently enabled tools cannot complete your task, call enable_toolset with the appropriate toolset name, then call get_toolset_tools to see what new capabilities are available.'
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-150 chars with format hints. E.g., 'Username (GitHub handle, not email) to fetch teams for. If omitted, uses the authenticated user. Example: octocat'.
• Add error handling with recovery hints. E.g., if get_teams returns 404, respond: 'User not found. Verify the username is correct, or call get_me to confirm your own username.'
• Add brief descriptions to each toolset enum value. E.g., enable_toolset with toolset='repos' enables tools for repository management (create_repo, list_repos, get_repo_details, etc.). This helps LLMs decide which to enable without an extra discovery call.