Server has 19 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (deposit_memory, search_memories, retrieve_chunk). However, descriptions are terse (10-50 chars for most tools), parameter descriptions lack detail on constraints and formats, and output schemas are not documented. Error handling is minimal. Security concerns: API key passed via X-API-Key header (acceptable) but no per-tool permission documentation. Composition is reasonable, tools are single-purpose, but many lack the LLM-optimized descriptions (50-200 chars) and constraint details needed for reliable agent invocation.

• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 characters. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and WHAT it returns. Example: 'Search knowledge chunks by tags, type, or query string. Returns up to 50 matching chunks with IDs, content, and confidence scores. Use this to find relevant memories before depositing new ones.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Add a 'Returns' section to each description listing key response fields. Example: 'Returns: {chunk_id, agent_id, type, content, tags, confidence, deposited_at}'
• Add constraint details to parameter descriptions. Example: 'limit (integer, 1-200): Maximum results to return. Defaults to 50. Higher limits may slow queries.'
• Consolidate or remove V1 alias tools. If they are truly deprecated, remove them. If they are canonical, rename to remove '_alias' suffix and update descriptions to explain their purpose.
• Add error handling guidance to tool descriptions. Example: 'If chunk not found, returns 404 with available chunk IDs. If permission denied, returns 403 with required scopes.'