14 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (get_, create_, update_, list_, like_, publish_). Descriptions are concise (10-100 chars) but lack LLM-optimized context about when to use each tool vs. alternatives. Parameter descriptions are minimal or absent for many fields (e.g., 'publication_url' lacks format guidance; 'limit' and 'offset' lack range documentation). No output schemas documented. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. Irreversible operations (publish_post) lack confirmation/dry-run patterns. Security: credentials injected server-side (good), but no tool-level permission declarations or audit trail guidance.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., get_posts should return {posts: [{id, slug, title, author, date, ...}], total_count, has_more}. Include field types and which IDs chain to downstream tools.
• Add JSON Schema constraints to parameters: limit as integer with minimum/maximum, publication_url with format/pattern, audience as enum [everyone, paid]. Move constraints from description text into schema.
• Implement confirmation pattern for publish_post: add optional 'confirm' boolean parameter, or split into publish_draft (dry-run) + confirm_publish (irreversible). Warn agents before sending emails.
• Enrich error responses with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Publication not found. Try get_profile(slug) first to verify the publication exists, or list available publications.'
• Add tool-level permission declarations in descriptions. E.g., 'Requires: write:drafts, read:publications. Scope: authenticated user only.' This enables least-privilege agent configs.