webdev-ai provides 10 tools with reasonable naming (verb_noun pattern) and descriptions. However, critical gaps exist: parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely (browser_connect, browser_eval lack detail on expected formats), output schemas are undocumented, and error handling guidance is absent. Tool descriptions average ~80 chars (below the 194-char baseline for A+ tools). The browser_eval tool accepts code as 'string|array' but provides no guidance on format, constraints, or error recovery. No pagination support documented for logs tool despite potentially large result sets. Security concerns: browser_eval allows arbitrary JavaScript execution with minimal guardrails.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify what fields browser_list returns (e.g., [{browser_id, server_id, status, url}]), so LLMs know what data is available and can chain calls correctly.
• Expand browser_eval description with format constraints: 'code: string (single JS statement) or array of strings (auto-wait between lines). Max 10KB. Timeout 30s. Errors return {error, stack}. Persistent state object available across calls.'
• Add parameter descriptions for browser_connect: 'project: string in format "projectId:type" or just "projectId" or directory path. Resolves to server ID. Optional; defaults to first registered project.'
• Implement pagination for logs tool: add 'offset' (default 0) and 'limit' (default 50, max 500) parameters. Return {entries: [...], total: N, hasMore: boolean} to enable multi-page queries.
• Add error recovery guidance to all tools. E.g., browser_eval: 'If code execution fails, check syntax and available globals (document, window, state). If timeout occurs, break code into smaller statements.'